|
![]() |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Published Apr 22, 2008, 12:01am
(Updated Apr 22, 2008, 12:05am)
Here we are ten days before the month of May in 2008 and Lake Lanier is still 13 feet below its full pool level. Lake Lanier residents and recreation dependent businesses are paying the price. Recreation activity is limited, property values continue to plummet, and business revenues, profits and employment are in decline. Lake Lanier, and those whose livelihood and quality of life rely on it, are suffering huge negative consequences from low lake levels.
Downstream there is an abundance of water in the rivers and reservoirs. West Point Lake and Lake George are two feet above their seasonal full pool levels, and the Apalachicola River has been flowing with plentiful water since January.
Georgia and the Corps of Engineers (Corps) have made and proposed Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) operation changes that have a small impact on Apalachicola River flows, but those proposals are always met with strong resistance from Florida, citing the supposed runaway growth and resultant water use increases in Metropolitan Atlanta (Atlanta) as causing huge negative consequences for Florida.
The claims of Atlanta water use causing a significant Florida problem are just ridiculous. On average, Atlanta water consumption amounts to less than two percent of the Apalachicola River flow, hardly a significant difference. Even in times of drought Atlanta water consumption only amounts to less than 10 percent of the Apalachicola river flow.
How did we get to the situation in which we now find ourselves? The cause has been a drought and mismanagement of the ACF river system. Nature has supplied too little water to enter Lanier, and the Corps has released too much water from Lanier. We humans have little control over what nature provides, but we do have a lot of control over Lanier water releases.
The Corps, disproportionately responding to unfair downstream demands, and through its own mistakes, released too much water from Lake Lanier. A Corps error in 2006 caused 22 Billion gallons of water (almost 2 feet of lake level) to be mistakenly released. And, to satisfy excessive downstream demands, Lake Lanier was lowered from a level of 1068.5 in May of 2007 to a record low level of 1050.8 in December.
Meanwhile, Apalachicola River flows were being held unreasonably high for some threatened and endangered species without knowing how much flow is required for the survival of the species. What happened to these species before the dams were built on the Chattahoochee River? Without the dams the natural flows in 2007 would have dropped far below the minimum provided by the Corps’ control of the ACF River system, so what would real nature have done to the species?
Also, without science to back it up, Florida demands that large quantities of ACF water be released into the Gulf of Mexico for its oyster industry.
To the contrary, I think the facts (e.g. the current continuing record breaking low Lake Lanier levels) and resultant losses clearly demonstrate that more water should be stored in Lake Lanier during times of plentiful rain, to be released more slowly during other times.
Lanier is still almost 5 feet lower than ever before experienced at this time of the year. The reason for Lanier remaining low, while downstream the ACF is experiencing abundance, is that the lake is a very large for the size of the watershed draining into it. Downstream reservoirs have much less capacity and are fed by much larger watersheds. So, when it rains there are times when there is an abundance of water downstream while Lanier struggles to add just a few feet to its level.
Lanier should be the storage of last resort, with as much water as possible saved to protect against the worst ACF droughts, but that is not the case. Florida and Alabama’s demands for larger river flows carry more weight with the Corps than Atlanta and the Lanier community’s pleadings for wiser action.
The outlook for Lanier for the remainder of the year is terrible. A continued period of low rainfall is forecast. Georgia and the Corps have proposed changes in ACF management, which result in only miniscule improvements in Lake Lanier’s lowest level. Chances are that Lanier will go no higher than 1060 (11 feet below the full summer pool level of 1071) this year before the summer season sets in and the lake is once again lowered. Down to what level? We don’t know. Last year at this time Lake Lanier’s level was 1068.5 and it went down to 1050.8 in December.
The lake is now at 1057.5 and if we have the lake level drop this year as was experienced last year between April 20 and December (17.7 feet) we could expect the lake to be at a level of 1039.8 by the end of the year. Hopefully the Corps will manage the ACF system this year to avoid that extreme, but how low will the lake really go? It could certainly go much lower than the record low achieved last December.
Significant changes in the Corps’ management of the ACF are required to avoid even worse Lake Lanier recreation and Atlanta water supply consequences this year. So far, there is no hint that significant changes are being considered.
I think the Lake Lanier community needs to be much more aggressive in advocating significant ACF operation changes to help Lake Lanier better satisfy legitimate and most important needs.
Lake Lanier results from a Corps 4/15/08 Proposal
Above is a Corps chart showing what would have been Lanier’s level in 2007/8 if the Corps proposed ACF operations change had been in effect. The lake level would have been lower during the summer months and about one foot higher than the lowest level actually achieved in December.
Green is actual observed Lake Lanier level
Red is level if the proposal had been in effect during the same time period
Comments
3 comment(s) on this page. Add your own comment below.
Ron,
Do you think the corps would leave stop releasing water from the lake if Atlanta could get water from another source? Why can't the Atlanta area get water from the Savannah River? Parts of it run through Georgia. Why do we have to fight with Tennessee? There must be a reason. Can you tell me why? Wouldn't it be cheaper than bringing it from Tennesee?
The
Savannah River Savannah River, one of Georgia's longest and largest waterways, defines most of the boundary between Georgia and South Carolina. The river originates at the confluence of the Seneca and Tugaloo rivers in Hart County in eastern Georgia. The confluence also forms Lake Hartwell, a large reservoir built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Though the Savannah itself begins in the Piedmont geologic province, its tributary headwaters originate on the southwestern slopes of the rugged Blue Ridge geologic province of Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. Only about 6 percent of the Savannah's entire drainage basin, however, lies within the Blue Ridge. The rest lies in the Piedmont and in the Upper and Lower Coastal Plain provinces.
On a map, the basin roughly resembles an arrowhead. It encompasses 10,577 square miles, of which 175 square miles are in southwestern North Carolina, 4,581 square miles are in western South Carolina, and 5,821 square miles are in eastern Georgia. In Georgia, the basin drains portions of twenty-seven counties.
From Lake Hartwell, the Savannah River flows southeasterly for 313 miles across the Piedmont and the Upper Coastal Plain until it empties into the Atlantic Ocean 13 miles downstream from the city of Savannah. As such, the Savannah is an alluvial stream, meaning that its waters originate in the mountains and the Piedmont and flow across the Coastal Plain to the ocean. The alluvial rivers transport large amounts of sediments, which contribute to the sand deposits on coastal islands, and of nutrients that nourish life in the river.
At the U.S. Geological Survey river gauge near Clyo, in Effingham County, the Savannah's average annual flow is 12,040 cubic feet per second, one of the largest discharges of freshwater from any river in the Southeast. (One cubic foot equals about 7.4 gallons.) The gauge at Clyo, approximately sixty-one miles upstream of the mouth of the Savannah, is the most downstream gauge that records river discharges. Below this point, the Savannah is tidally influenced, and conventional river-flow measurement is unreliable.
On
Diversion Dam its journey to the sea, the Savannah flows through forests, agricultural lands, large hydroelectric reservoirs, and extensive swamps. It is known for its high bluffs, some of which were the locations of prehistoric Native American villages.
The river provides drinking water to two of Georgia's major metropolitan areas, Augusta and Savannah, and assimilates their treated wastewater. It is also a source of drinking water for the cities of Beaufort and Hilton Head in South Carolina and for many smaller municipalities in the basin. In addition, the Savannah supplies water for the Savannah River Site in South Carolina, as well as for the two nuclear reactors of Plant Vogtle, a major electricity-generating facility operated by Georgia Power Company in Burke County.
On the coast, the Savannah River is the shipping channel for the Port of Savannah, the nation's tenth-busiest port for oceangoing container ships. Before emptying into the Atlantic, the Savannah forms a braided network of tidal creeks, salt marshes, and freshwater marshes, much of which constitutes the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge, one of Georgia's prime bird-watching spots.
Path to the Sea
Upper Section
The
Russell Dam stretch of river north of Augusta is known as the upper Savannah, along which is located Lake Hartwell, the first of three large lakes built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The other two are Lake Richard B. Russell and Clarks Hill Lake. The reservoirs regulate the river's flow and provide hydroelectric power, flood control, recreation, and drinking-water storage. The 56,000-acre Lake Hartwell, about 90 miles north of Augusta, was completed in 1963. The 26,650-acre Richard B. Russell Lake, just downstream from Hartwell, was finished in 1983. The 71,535-acre Clarks Hill Lake (known as J. Strom Thurmond Lake in South Carolina), downstream from Russell and 22 miles north of Augusta, was created in 1954.
The Savannah's major tributaries in the upper stretch are the Broad and Little rivers, which flow into Clarks Hill Lake. Downstream from Clarks Hill Dam, the middle section of the Savannah begins. This section is located partially in the Piedmont but is predominately in the Upper Coastal Plain. Shortly after flowing out of Clarks Hill, the river runs through a series of shoals. Just above Augusta, river water is partially diverted into the Augusta Canal. Water in the canal, used for power and water supply, feeds back into the Savannah River at various locations.
Middle Section
In the middle section of the Savannah, wide flood plains and wetlands begin to emerge along the waterway. A notable feature is the eighty-four-acre Savannah River Bluffs Heritage Preserve, just outside the city of North Augusta in Aiken County, South Carolina. The preserve contains one of the few remaining river shoals in the Savannah River. Rock formations that may be remnants of ancient Native American fishing weirs occur in the waterway here.
In Augusta the Savannah River passes through a heavily industrialized area of chemical plants and other facilities that discharge treated wastes into the river. About thirty-five miles downstream from Augusta, the huge twin cooling towers of the Vogtle nuclear plant loom along the river in Burke County. In 1983 fossilized whale bones dating back 40 million years were discovered during plant construction.
Across the river from Plant Vogtle, in South Carolina, sits the U.S. Department of Energy's 310-square-mile Savannah River Site, whose five reactors churned out tons of radioactive plutonium and tritium for thermonuclear weapons from the 1950s through the 1980s.The site once sucked hundreds of millions of gallons each day from the Savannah to cool the reactors, which are no longer in operation. The site still uses water from the river for other purposes.
Also in the middle stretch is Shell Bluff, a scenic and noteworthy bluff just south of the fall line in Burke County. A nearly vertical face rises more than 100 feet directly above the river. The cliff-like face is chalky white, due to material weathered from limestone. The presence of giant fossilized oyster shells here is evidence that the fall line formed a coastline some 50 million years ago. The naturalist John Bartram, father of William Bartram, visited Shell Bluff in 1765 to study the large shell formation.
Lower Section
Farther downstream, in Screven County, Brier Creek is the Savannah's only major tributary south of Augusta. The confluence marks the beginning of the lower Savannah. In general, the lower Savannah (to the place where Interstate 95 crosses the river) encompasses a more pristine environment, with oxbow lakes, extensive river swamps, bottomland forests, and blackwater tributaries.
The Savannah River is generally navigable from Augusta to Savannah, a distance of approximately 200 miles. The waterway was formerly maintained for navigation by the Corps of Engineers. In the late 1950s through the early 1960s, the corps constructed thirty-eight cuts across meander bends, shortening the river by seventy-eight miles to provide a more direct route to the sea. Nevertheless, by 1980, shipping on the river between Augusta and Savannah had virtually ceased. Channel maintenance between the two cities was discontinued. Today, due to the lack of commercial traffic, the corps is considering a project to restore the meanders and dismantle the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam.
About
Port of Savannah twenty-eight miles upstream from where the Savannah enters the Atlantic Ocean, saltwater begins mixing with the river's freshwater to form an estuary. Past the Interstate 95 bridge the estuary becomes a complex, tidally driven system of deltaic channels as the Savannah splits into three forks: the easternmost Back River, the centrally flowing Middle River, and the western Front River. At the city of Savannah, the split-up river, now an estuary, enters into its most heavily used stretch. It is used for several purposes, including a major industrial complex, the Savannah harbor, and the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge. The Savannah River estuary has been heavily contaminated over the years with sewage and industrial wastes, but these pollutants have been reduced considerably in recent years.
The Back and Middle rivers, relatively narrow and shallow streams, sustain the 29,000-acre wildlife refuge. The refuge and surrounding area contain 21 percent of the tidal freshwater marsh—much of it former rice fields—in South Carolina and Georgia and 28 percent of the freshwater marsh along the eastern coast of the United States. The Front River, the Savannah's largest channel, has been extensively widened and deepened to provide deep-water shipping access for the Port of Savannah. At present, the shipping channel extends approximately twenty-one miles inland from the mouth of the Savannah. Periodic dredging keeps its maximum depth to forty-two feet.
Below the city of Savannah, the river picks up more of the characteristics of a tidal river, with more treacherous currents, saltier water, and extensive expanses of salt marsh dominated by the plant Spartina alterniflora, or smooth cordgrass. In this area the river exhibits one of the highest tidal ranges on the U.S. East Coast; the difference between low tide and high tide can be more than seven feet.
Ecology and Biological Resources
From its beginning as a clear, cool, free-flowing stream in the Blue Ridge Mountains to its end as a coastal estuary, the Savannah River and its tributaries sustain some of the world's most diverse and biologically rich ecosystems. The Nature Conservancy of Georgia describes the Savannah River basin's abundant diversity of life as rivaling that of a South American rain forest. The natural splendor attracted many early naturalists, including eighteenth-century explorers Mark Catesby and John and William Bartram, who marveled over the basin's flora and fauna.
The basin's forest types range from mixed deciduous and evergreen forests in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont to coastal maritime forests dominated by spreading live oaks in the Lower Coastal Plain. Bottomland forests, stretching for miles on either side of the river south of Augusta, harbor towering cypress and tupelo trees. Other typical river-swamp species include such canopy trees as green ash, overcup oak, swamp blackgum, and water hickory, and such understory flora as saw palmetto, swamp dogwood, and swamp palm.
The
False Rue Anemone basin is home to more than seventy-five species of rare plants and animals, including the majestic swallow-tailed kite, the rocky shoals spider lily, and the wild cocoa tree. On river bluffs near Augusta, such rare plants as bottle-brush buckeye, false rue anemone, and relict trillium can be found.
The Georgia and South Carolina Heritage programs list eighteen fish species in the basin as species of concern because of their limited populations. Most notable are the robust redhorse (Moxostoma robustum), previously believed to be extinct but documented in the middle section of the Savannah in 1997, and the federally endangered shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), of which only about 3,000 are known to exist in the Savannah River.
In total, more than 110 fish species have been documented in the Savannah basin. Both wild and stocked rainbow trout and brown trout are the principal sport fishes in the upper reaches of the Tallulah and Chattooga rivers. Some headwater areas contain reproducing populations of native brook trout.
The fish communities of the headwater streams change rapidly from cold-water to warm-water species in response to decreasing elevations and increasing water temperatures. The largest group of species belongs to the sucker family. Warm-water species include American shad, black crappie, bluegill, chain pickerel, channel catfish, largemouth bass, redbreast sunfish, redear sunfish, striped bass, and white bass.
A diversity of reptiles and amphibians live in the Savannah basin, including the American alligator; nonpoisonous snakes like the coachwhip, rat, rough green, and speckled king; poisonous snakes like the eastern cottonmouths, rattlesnake, and southern copperhead; several species of frogs and turtles; and numerous species of lizards and salamanders, including the endangered flatwoods salamander and striped newt.
The lower Savannah's blackwater tributaries are of exceptional biological value, providing outstanding habitat for a high number of vertebrate and invertebrate species. Of special note is Ebenezer Creek in Effingham County, upstream from the city of Savannah. Ebenezer is one of Georgia's four designated Wild and Scenic Rivers, and the only one on the coast. It is also designated a National Natural Landmark. Ebenezer's swamp consists of unusual virgin bald cypress, with huge swollen buttresses eight to twelve feet wide, which support tree trunks of unusually small diameters. Some of the trees are estimated to be more than a thousand years old.
Human History
The
Savannah Riverfront Savannah River's banks are steeped in human history. Portions of the river flow through the sites of some of the most important archaeological digs in the United States. Some of those projects took place in the 1960s in what is now Lake Russell, before it was filled with water.
Archaeologists believe that the Paleoindians first appeared along the Savannah River near the end of the Ice Age, some 12,000 years ago. Clovis points, or stone projectiles used by Paleoindians for hunting, have been found along the Savannah. About 4,500 years ago, in the late Archaic era, crude pottery appeared near the river. Some of the oldest pottery in North America was discovered at Stallings Island, a National Historic Landmark located in the Savannah eight miles upstream from Augusta.
The first-known European explorer to reach the Savannah was Hernando de Soto in 1540. He and his soldiers crossed the river, probably near what is now Augusta, where the river divided and swept around an island. In the late sixteenth century the French started the first European commerce on the Savannah, trading with the Indians for sassafras. Sassafras may have triggered the first naval battle on the river. In 1605 the Spanish, who claimed ownership of the New World territory, came upon a group of French traders on the river and defeated them in a bloody battle.
Some time during the early seventeenth century, the Westo Indians took up residence along the Savannah. They became allies of the English in South Carolina and acted as a buffer against the Spanish to the south. The English traded guns and cloth with the Indians for furs and deerskins. Deerskins were shipped by pack trains and flatboats down the Savannah and around the inland waterway to Charleston, South Carolina, and thence to England.
In the early 1700s growing tensions between the British in South Carolina and the Spanish in Florida prompted the British to establish another colony on the river to buttress the Carolina settlement. In 1733 James Edward Oglethorpe chose a forty-foot-high bluff on the Savannah, eighteen miles upriver from the ocean, as the site of Georgia's first town, Savannah. One year after Savannah's founding, German Lutherans seeking religious freedom sailed thirty miles up the river to establish the town of Ebenezer. In 1735 Oglethorpe established Augusta; his choice of the upriver location was influenced by profitable trade with the Indians.
The Savannah settlement discovered that the marshlands around Savannah were ideal for the cultivation of a particular staple—rice. In the early years of the colony, rice plantations dotted the riverbanks and marshlands, whose waters, fed by the river and the tides, allowed for a rapid prosperity.
When the American Revolution (1775-83) erupted, the patriots quickly saw the strategic importance of the Savannah. Twelve stockade-type forts were already located along the waterway to protect against Indian attacks when the war began. Most of the forts were strengthened when hostilities with the British heated up around 1776. The economic importance of the Savannah River to Georgia was reflected in the state's original Constitution of 1777. Four of the eight original counties established by the constitution were located along the Savannah—Burke, Effingham, Richmond, and Wilkes. The other four counties were along the coast.
After the Revolutionary War, rice continued to be a major crop. But in 1793, at Catharine Greene's plantation on the banks of the Savannah, just upstream from the city, Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. In short order, cotton dominated the region completely. The central sections of Georgia and South Carolina, including the areas bordering the Savannah, became the main cotton-producing region for the entire country. Intense plowing practices caused topsoil to erode and wash off into the Savannah and its tributaries, choking the life out of many of them. In November 1808 the first steamboat appeared on the Savannah, and soon the vessels became regular sights on the river between Savannah and Augusta, as they hauled cotton to markets in Savannah.
Early
Cotton Shipping in the Civil War (1861-65), the Union blockaded the river and strangled the Port of Savannah. After the war, cotton shipping resumed on the river, but by the 1890s, a declining market and the arrival of the boll weevil greatly reduced the amount of the product going downriver. By that time two other products, naval stores and lumber, were in high demand. Countless trees in the swamps and forests along the Savannah were felled and floated downstream in huge log rafts to satisfy the lumber industry's voracious appetite. After a time, the floating rafts of timber were about the only activity on the river; the steamboats had given way to railroads.
In 1915 representatives of the sugar industry selected a site several miles upriver from Savannah for a sprawling sugar plant that could be reached by oceangoing freighters in the river. A channel to accommodate ships was opened in 1917, paving the way for Savannah to become a major port. In 1945 the Georgia Ports Authority was formed, and the river was dredged to thirty-eight feet. In 1994 the channel was deepened to forty-two feet. Eventually, the river will be deepened to forty-eight feet, or twice its normal depth, to accommodate larger oceangoing vessels.
Environmental Concerns
Despite the river's scenic beauty and natural diversity, the ecological health of the Savannah River system—from the headwaters to the estuary—is declining, according to the Nature Conservancy of Georgia, which regularly monitors the river system.
The huge dams and reservoirs on the upper Savannah have negatively altered the river's natural flow patterns, which support the basin's diversity of wildlife. Impoundments, for instance, have changed and interrupted the natural hydrologic patterns of Ebenezer Creek, causing concern for the health of the blackwater stream. The Corps of Engineers has experimented with altering water-release patterns from Clarks Hill lake to determine whether high-flow releases could help the swamp.
In addition, large-scale timbering, municipal water needs, and harbor-dredging and expansion are contributing to the degradation of the entire ecosystem, according to the Nature Conservancy. Environmentalists contend that each dredging of the Savannah harbor affects the estuary's freshwater-saltwater composition, impacting the flora and fauna of surrounding marshes.
Legions of anglers, for instance, were once attracted by the abundant populations of striped bass found in the Savannah. But saltwater intrusions from dredging to increase river depth, along with a tide gate built on the Back River in the 1970s, increased salinity levels, which decimated 98 percent of the fish's eggs. Officials have stopped using the tide gate, and striped bass populations are recovering.
Communities along the Savannah also are concerned about the water supply in the river. They want to make sure that the river will provide clean water for drinking and for recreational and industrial use, even during drought. In 2005 Georgia and South Carolina started formal talks over sharing the Savannah's water. Another concern is that Atlanta, about 150 miles west of the Savannah River, will try to take water from the river when the metropolitan area's water sources reach their capacity by 2030. A similar concern is that the Greenville-Spartanburg area in South Carolina takes millions of gallons of water out of the Savannah basin but does not return treated water to the basin.
In addition, saltwater intrusion in the Floridan aquifer, a honeycomb of underground lakes underlying much of south Georgia, has forced coastal communities in both Georgia and South Carolina to depend more on the Savannah for drinking water and industrial needs.
Environmentalists predict that as the Savannah basin experiences population growth, industries and towns that discharge treated wastewater into the river will have to find ways of reducing their pollution to make more water available for human consumption. Industries and towns on the Georgia side of the river account for 90 percent of the wastewater discharges into the river from Augusta to the ocean. New development and population growth itself threaten the river basin's water quality as well. For instance, environmental authorities are concerned that growth around the reservoirs on the upper Savannah will degrade the water quality of the lakes, especially that of Lake Hartwell along the Interstate 85 corridor.
Communities downstream of the Savannah River Site are concerned about the plant's releases of radionuclides, including tritium, cesium, and strontium, into the river. Health officials consider the low dosages of radionuclides to be safe, but the communities are concerned that accidental releases of higher levels could contaminate drinking water. Another pollutant is mercury, which appears to come primarily from coal-fueled power generation and the manufacture of chlorine for bleach. Mercury contaminates fishes and the people who consume them.
Suggested Reading
George Hatcher, ed., Georgia Rivers: Articles from the Atlanta Journal and Constitution Magazine (Athens: University of Georgia Press, [1962]).
Sharyn Kane and Richard Keeton, Beneath These Waters: Archeological and Historical Studies of 11,500 Years along the Savannah River ([Washington, D.C.: National Park Service], 1993).
Sharyn Kane and Richard Keeton, In Those Days: African-American Life near the Savannah River (Atlanta: National Park Service, 1994).
John C. Kilgo and John I. Blake, eds., Ecology and Management of a Forested Landscape: Fifty Years on the Savannah River Site (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2005).
Thomas L. Stokes, The Savannah (New York: Rinehart, [1951]).
Charles Seabrook, Decatur Published 10/13/2006
Printable Version
•Georgia Rivers LMER: Savannah River •Savannah River Region Health Information System •Savannah Riverkeeper •Savannah National Wildlife Refuge •U.S. Department of Energy: Savannah River Site A project of the Georgia Humanities Council, in partnership with the University of Georgia Press, the University System of Georgia/GALILEO, the Office of the Governor, and the Georgia Department of Technical and Adult Education.
Copyright 2004-2008 by the Georgia Humanities Council and the University of Georgia Press. All rights
Ga. officials take wrong tack on water
By Joe Cook For the Journal-Constitution
Published on: 04/22/08
Prompted by an unprecedented drought, we expected our leaders to address Georgia's water "crisis" during the 2008 legislative session. Instead, we got a bucketful of promises and tax-dollar-wasting pipe dreams.
With the state still reeling from the drought, Gov. Sonny Perdue pushed through the much-ballyhooed State Water Plan in the first five days of the session, only days after the plan had been completed and turned over to the General Assembly for review.
The result is 40 pages of policy statements with no force of law —- a plan to make a plan. Its only redemption is that it triggers assessments of the state's water supply, but the plan's ill-conceived "water planning districts" that ignore natural river-basin boundaries will likely doom Georgia to more water conflicts between upstream and downstream communities.
While Perdue urged Georgians to take shorter showers and take pride in their dirty cars, he proposed no meaningful conservation measures, and the Legislature did no better.
While House Speaker Glenn Richardson (R-Hiram) and Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle argued like schoolboys over tax cuts, each railroaded through his own reservoir bill, virtually guaranteeing tax-dollar waste through construction of reservoirs that may or may not be needed. The resulting legislation calls on the state to identify "feasible sites for water reservoirs" by Oct. 1 of this year —- well ahead of the completion of the State Water Plan's water assessments.
After Georgia lost a key legal battle in the water wars between Alabama and Florida, denying metro Atlanta the right to more of Lake Lanier for water supply, the Legislature, behaving like imperial Japan in 1941, opened a battle with Tennessee by passing a resolution that instructs the governor to steal water from the Tennessee River and pump it 120 miles to metro Atlanta. Never mind that such a project would cost Georgians hundreds of millions, perhaps billions, of dollars and violates a 2001 law passed by the Legislature prohibiting water transfers from outside metro Atlanta's boundaries. Leading up to the session, Perdue famously used the "read my lips" phrase when assuring downstream communities that metro Atlanta was not out to grab water. Now it appears those assurances were merely window dressing to sell the Water Plan.
And while Perdue persisted in his mandate that North Georgia water providers reduce their water use by 10 percent, he offered little assistance in meeting this mandate. Instead of supporting common-sense funding for locals to replace water-wasting toilets or tax incentives for businesses and homeowners to reduce water waste, the Legislature passed a bill that prevents local governments from implementing more aggressive water restrictions unless they can gain special approval from the state. The only water conservation measure passed the entire session was an amendment attached to another bill that will create a new sales tax holiday for water-efficient appliances.
Meanwhile, leadership thwarted every attempt to improve the State Water Plan. On the last day of the session, river advocates from across the state secured enough votes in the Senate to adopt a common-sense amendment to the Cagle-Richardson reservoir bills that would regulate interbasin transfers —- the practice of moving water from one river basin to another, which has proven to be one of the state's most divisive water issues.
When leadership got wind of this potential victory on the part of citizen activists, they pulled a back-door parliamentary procedure that assured passage of the cart-before-the-horse reservoir bills and killed any hope of interbasin transfer regulations.
The reservoir bill passed the Senate with three minutes left in the session. In the dramatic closing moments, as Sen. Ed Tarver (D-Augusta) attempted to take the floor to introduce the interbasin transfer amendment, Cagle ignored his colleague and called the vote.
In a session that was to be about drought relief and water conservation, Georgians got neither. Now we must pin our hopes on the bucketful of promises that is the State Water Plan.
Vote for this story! Buzz up!More on ajc.com Corps overtaps Lanier
Too much Lanier water was released, Corps says
Local control of water at risk
Tougher local watering restrictions more difficult with bill
Take quiz on plant watering
Want to water new plants? Take a quiz!
Tri-state water talks break down
Legislature 2008: Bill would shift power on water rules
Water-share talks now at a standstill
Bill would prevent local governments from making stronger water rules
Expand this list More StoriesRelated Subjects Atlanta Sonny Perdue Georgia Drought Weather Casey Cagle Clean Water Policy Politics Domestic Policy Political Policy Expand this list More Related Subjects
Using Lake Hartwell or the Savannah River to offset the problems at Lanier is not a viable option. Lake Hartwell has a much smaller drainage basin than any lake of it's size in the southeast, yet it supplies the water for the Savannah river and the river's municipal water sources, factories, two other lakes in the chain, etc. The mandated flow requirements are already compromising lake levels -- if water is drawn from the Savannah to be piped over to Atlanta, the flow requirements would probably have to be doubled. There would be no lake left! Lane Lanier and the Chattahoochee should be managed in a way to ensure plenty of drinking water for Atlanta. Leave Lake Hartwell out of it! Require that everyone in Atlanta that has public water install low-flow toilets. that's a start!
Add a Comment
Please be civil.